getJsonSection_behaviour

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only repeats the tool's purpose without disclosing any behavioral traits (e.g., read-only, authorization needs, side effects). For a simple get operation, the bar is low, but the description adds no extra context beyond the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence that front-loads the purpose. Every word earns its place; no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is mostly sufficient. It could hint at the content of the behaviour section or that a valid hash is required, but not critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description for the single parameter. The description does not add additional meaning or examples beyond what the schema already provides, meeting the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (Get), resource (behaviour section of MobSF JSON report), and identifier (by hash). Among many sibling tools for different sections, this uniquely identifies its target.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: use when you need the behaviour section. However, no explicit when-not conditions or alternatives (e.g., other sections via getJsonSection_*) are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.