get_rules
List all transaction rules with their conditions and actions for managing budget automation.
Instructions
List all transaction rules showing their conditions and actions.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all transaction rules with their conditions and actions for managing budget automation.
List all transaction rules showing their conditions and actions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The readOnlyHint annotation already indicates a safe read operation. The description adds that rules are shown with conditions and actions, providing useful behavioral context beyond the annotation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that immediately conveys the tool's function. No waste.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is adequate for a simple list tool. However, it lacks mention of potential pagination or sorting, which could be relevant for large rule sets.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are zero parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds value by specifying that the output includes conditions and actions, which is not in the empty schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists all transaction rules with their conditions and actions, distinguishing itself from sibling tools like create_rule and delete_rule.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like get_transactions or list_accounts. However, the context of sibling tools implies its use for rule retrieval.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/henfrydls/actual-budget-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server