Skip to main content
Glama
henfrydls

actual-budget-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to actual-budget-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects AI assistants to Actual Budget for budget management, enabling natural language queries, transaction creation, and spending analysis.
      1,271 npm
      66
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Actual Budget that enables AI agents to read accounts, transactions, categories, and budgets, as well as create and update transactions and transfers.
      11
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for integrating Actual Budget with Claude and other LLM assistants.
      17
      521 npm
      254
      TypeScript
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A personal MCP server that gives Claude native access to YNAB budget data.
      46
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server connecting Claude to YNAB (You Need A Budget) — view budgets, categorize & split transactions, manage targets, and get spending reports through conversation.
      28
      123 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A remote MCP server that lets users track expenses through Claude AI, supporting add, list, edit, and delete operations via natural language.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most CRUD tools target distinct entities and actions, but the analytical tools overlap considerably (budget_vs_actual, get_budget_month, spending_by_category, monthly_summary, category_trends, spending_projection all surface spending data with slightly different scopes). recategorize_transaction also overlaps with update_transaction since category is likely an updatable field. Descriptions help, but an agent could easily misselect among the reporting tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    CRUD operations follow a clear create_/update_/delete_ pattern, but read operations are split between list_accounts and get_* tools, and analytics use noun-phrase names like budget_vs_actual, monthly_summary, and spending_by_category. The mixing is readable but not a single predictable verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count2/5

    37 tools is a heavy surface; the rule of thumb for coherence is 3-15 well-scoped tools, and here there are many overlapping analytics/reporting tools (budget_vs_actual, spending_projection, category_trends, spending_by_category, monthly_summary, balance_history) that could be consolidated. The CRUD breadth is defensible, but the total count feels bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    Core CRUD is mostly covered for accounts, categories, payees, transactions, and rules, but accounts have no update/close tool (delete_account even suggests 'prefer closing' without providing one), and rules have no update mechanism. Budgeting, sync, and reconciliation workflows are otherwise reasonably complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week