Skip to main content
Glama
Snapchat Ads MCP Server

Snapchat Ads MCP Server

by get-mcp-ads

snapchat list ad creatives

snapchat_list_ad_creatives
Read-onlyIdempotent

Resolve ad-linked Snapchat images, videos, Story children, and Collection tiles into business names, native IDs, and fresh media URLs for creative review.

Instructions

Resolve ad-linked Snapchat images/videos, Story children and Collection tiles with business names, native IDs and fresh media URLs. Incomplete formats/media are reported. No performance is inferred. Media URLs are short-lived links from Snap; this server does not download them.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "adAccountId": "<adAccountId>"
    },
    "name": "snapchat_list_ad_creatives"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
adIdsNoSpecific ad UUIDs to resolve. Omit to resolve the first ads of the account.
limitNoAds to read when adIds is omitted, 1 to 60.
adAccountIdYesSnapchat ad account UUID listed in SNAPCHAT_ADS_ACCOUNT_IDS; never an organization ID.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYesOriginal tool result: parsed JSON when the text is JSON, otherwise the text or multiple MCP content blocks. Provider fields depend on the selected query.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.0.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / adAccountId / pattern
      Added value: +"^([0-9a-fA-F]{8}-[0-9a-fA-F]{4}-[1-8][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[89abAB][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[0-9a-fA-F]{12}|00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000|ffffffff-ffff-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff)$"
    • addedInput schema / properties / adIds / items / pattern
      Added value: +"^([0-9a-fA-F]{8}-[0-9a-fA-F]{4}-[1-8][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[89abAB][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[0-9a-fA-F]{12}|00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000|ffffffff-ffff-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff)$"
    • changedOutput schema / properties / result / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "additionalProperties": true,
      -    "properties": {},
      -    "type": "object"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "items": {},
      -    "type": "array"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "number"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "boolean"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": {},
      +    "properties": {},
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "items": {},
      +    "type": "array"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "boolean"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
  2. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive), and the description adds genuinely non-structured context: media URLs are short-lived Snap links, the server does not download them, and incomplete formats are flagged rather than silently dropped. The 'no performance is inferred' exclusion also prevents a common misreading. Missing only rate/pagination behaviour.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the verb and resource, then the caveats in descending importance (incomplete data, no performance, expiring URLs). Every clause carries information an agent could otherwise get wrong.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present the description need not explain return shape, and it correctly spends its words on the non-obvious traits: expiring URLs and partial-format reporting. It is nearly complete, though a note on how the limit/adIds interplay affects result volume would close the last gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so adIds, limit and adAccountId are fully documented upstream, including the 'omit adIds to resolve the first ads' fallback and the limit bounds. The description adds no parameter semantics of its own, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb ('Resolve') plus a precise resource set: ad-linked images/videos, Story children and Collection tiles, with the returned fields named (business names, native IDs, fresh media URLs). An agent understands the operation without opening the schema. It stops short of 5 because it never names the adjacent siblings (snapchat_get_creatives, snapchat_get_media) that an agent must choose between.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: 'Resolve ad-linked' suggests it is the creative-resolution path for ads, and 'Incomplete formats/media are reported' hints at error-tolerant behaviour. There is no statement of when to prefer this over snapchat_get_creatives or snapchat_get_media, nor any prerequisite or exclusion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.