Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Snapchat Ads MCP Server

Snapchat Ads MCP Server

by get-mcp-ads
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

snapchat get targeting specs

snapchat_get_targeting_specs
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve separately stored targeting specs for a Snapchat ad squad, including configurations over 500 criteria that standard squad responses may omit.

Instructions

Read separately stored targeting specs, including configurations exceeding 500 criteria. These can be omitted from the ordinary ad squad response.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "adAccountId": "<adAccountId>",
      "adsquadId": "<adsquadId>"
    },
    "name": "snapchat_get_targeting_specs"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum entities per page, 1 to 1000.
cursorNoOpaque cursor from the previous response's next_cursor. Omit on the first request.
adsquadIdYesAd squad UUID in the selected account.
adAccountIdYesSnapchat ad account UUID listed in SNAPCHAT_ADS_ACCOUNT_IDS; never an organization ID.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYesOriginal tool result: parsed JSON when the text is JSON, otherwise the text or multiple MCP content blocks. Provider fields depend on the selected query.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.0.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / adAccountId / pattern
      Added value: +"^([0-9a-fA-F]{8}-[0-9a-fA-F]{4}-[1-8][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[89abAB][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[0-9a-fA-F]{12}|00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000|ffffffff-ffff-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff)$"
    • addedInput schema / properties / adsquadId / pattern
      Added value: +"^([0-9a-fA-F]{8}-[0-9a-fA-F]{4}-[1-8][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[89abAB][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[0-9a-fA-F]{12}|00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000|ffffffff-ffff-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff)$"
    • changedOutput schema / properties / result / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
-  {
-    "additionalProperties": true,
-    "properties": {},
-    "type": "object"
-  },
-  {
-    "items": {},
-    "type": "array"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "number"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "boolean"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]New value: +[
+  {
+    "additionalProperties": {},
+    "properties": {},
+    "type": "object"
+  },
+  {
+    "items": {},
+    "type": "array"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "number"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "boolean"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "null"
+  }
+]
  2. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this as a safe, read-only, idempotent operation. The description adds useful behavioral context by noting that some targeting specs may be omitted from the ordinary ad squad response. It does not mention authentication requirements, rate limits, or pagination behavior beyond what the schema provides.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences with no wasted language. The core purpose is front-loaded, and the follow-up sentence adds relevant context about why separate storage matters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, annotations fully cover safety semantics, and the input schema documents parameters. The description supplies the key missing context that large targeting specs may be omitted from ordinary responses. It is only slightly incomplete in not routing the agent among related targeting tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all four parameters are already documented in the input schema, including pagination and UUID requirements. The description adds no additional parameter-level meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: reading separately stored targeting specs. It also clarifies that these specs can include configurations exceeding 500 criteria and may be omitted from the ordinary ad squad response. It does not explicitly distinguish this tool from sibling targeting tools such as snapchat_get_targeting or snapchat_get_targeting_options.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use the tool: when targeting specs are stored separately or may be omitted from the ordinary ad squad response, especially for large configurations. However, it does not explicitly say when to choose this over sibling tools like snapchat_get_targeting, nor does it state exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools