remove_sketch_from_workspace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden for a mutating operation. It discloses that file deletion is optional and off by default (also in the schema), but says nothing about reversibility, whether removal affects an open sketch, permission or workspace-state prerequisites, or what happens if the sketch is not in the workspace.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with the core action front-loaded and the optional behavior parenthesized. Nothing is padded, though the brevity is partly under-specification rather than tightness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (2 params, fully described schema, no output schema), but with zero annotations and a potentially destructive file-deletion flag, the description should say more about consequences and the sibling `delete_sketch` overlap. As written, an agent has no basis to judge risk.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both `sketchId` and `deleteFile` are already documented with defaults, making 3 the baseline. The description's "optionally delete the file" merely restates the `deleteFile` parameter and adds no new semantics such as permanence or side effects.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ("Remove a sketch from the active workspace") and the parenthetical clarifies that the file itself is only affected optionally. That distinction matters because a sibling `delete_sketch` exists, but the description never names or contrasts with it, so an agent still has to infer the boundary.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit guidance on when to call this instead of `delete_sketch`, `add_sketch_to_workspace`, or `list_workspace_sketches`. The phrase "optionally delete the file" only implies a remove-vs-delete distinction; the agent must construct the decision rule itself.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.