Skip to main content
Glama

sheet_base

Start a sheet-metal part by extruding a closed straight-sided profile or sketch to a set thickness, returning a handle for adding flanges, tabs, and flat patterns.

Instructions

Start a sheet-metal part: the base flange, a closed straight-sided profile extruded to thickness_mm. Everything else (flanges, tabs, hems, the flat pattern, the DXF) hangs off the handle this returns.

profile: [[x, y], ...] in the XY plane, implicitly closed. sketch: alternatively a handle to a closed, planar, straight-sided sketch — on any plane. Arcs are REJECTED rather than silently faceted, because a faceted flat pattern is a wrong flat pattern. material: any Materials-DB name (e.g. "Steel-A36", "AL6061-T6", "SS304"); it selects the K-factor and minimum-bend-radius corpus rows.

IMPORTANT — the profile is the flat face TANGENT TO TANGENT, not the outside dimension. Bends grow OUTWARD from the profile boundary, exactly as a base flange behaves in any sheet-metal CAD, so a U-channel of 100 mm outside width with R = t = 2 starts from a 92 mm profile.

The bend model lives alongside the handle for the life of the worker session, like every other handle: unfolding is a property of the FEATURE TREE, not of the fused solid, so a part reopened from disk in a new session is a solid rather than a sheet part. Cutting one (boolean_op cut, e.g. to drill it) keeps it a sheet part; fusing arbitrary material onto it does not.

Returns {handle, name, volume, thickness_mm, material, profile, area_mm2}.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoSheetBase
sketchNo
profileNo
materialNo
thickness_mmYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral disclosure burden and does so thoroughly. It explains arc rejection, bend-model session persistence, why reopening from disk loses sheet-part status in a new session, and how boolean cut versus fuse affects the sheet feature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is lengthy but appropriately sized for a complex sheet-metal starting feature. It is front-loaded, structured by parameter labels and an IMPORTANT design note, and every paragraph adds distinct information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

It covers purpose, input alternatives, material selection behavior, critical tangent-to-tangent geometry, session persistence caveats, and return fields. Only the precedence when both profile and sketch are supplied is unstated, which is minor against the description's overall completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate, and it strongly does for profile, sketch, material, and thickness. It does not explain the name parameter, leaving one of five parameters to its schema default and title.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource: 'Start a sheet-metal part: the base flange' and clarifies this is a closed profile extruded to thickness. It distinguishes itself from sibling sheet-metal features by saying flanges, tabs, hems, the flat pattern, and DXF all hang off the returned handle.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly frames this as the starting operation and explains the two input paths: profile or sketch, with sketch arcs rejected rather than faceted. It also specifies material naming and states that downstream sheet-metal features follow from the returned handle.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools