updateSettings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes partial update behavior ('only provided fields will be updated'), which is a key behavioral trait. However, it does not mention mutability, response format, or error cases. No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences plus a safety note. Every sentence adds value, and the key action is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks return value information, no guidance on choosing between this and specialized update tools, and does not explain the scope of settings. For a tool with 5 parameters and nested objects, more context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no parameter-specific information beyond what is already in the input schema. Schema description coverage is 60%, so the baseline is 3; the description does not improve or worsen clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Updates configuration settings for a profile' and specifies partial update behavior. However, it does not differentiate itself from numerous sibling update tools that target specific settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The safety note restricts usage to designated test profiles, but there is no guidance on when to use this tool versus the many specific update tools (e.g., updateBlockPageSettings).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.