removeFromParentalControlCategories

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description lacks details about behavioral traits such as side effects, reversibility, required permissions, or error conditions. The safety note hints at destructiveness but does not elaborate, leaving the agent underinformed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one sentence for the action and one for the safety note. It is front-loaded and contains no superfluous information, earning a perfect score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (2 required params, 100% schema coverage, no output schema), the description is adequate but minimal. It omits details like how to obtain category IDs, expected outcomes, or error handling, which would be useful for a safer invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers both parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The description does not add extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the action ('Removes') and the target resource ('category from the parental control blocklist'). It directly differentiates from siblings like `removeFromParentalControlServices` and `removeFromAllowlist` by naming the specific list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The safety note explicitly restricts usage to 'designated test profiles,' providing clear context about when to use the tool. However, it does not mention alternatives or when not to use it (e.g., production profiles) beyond the note.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.