getSettings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It only states 'Retrieves the configuration settings' without disclosing behavioral traits such as idempotency, error handling, permissions needed, or whether the settings are read-only. Output schema exists but description adds no behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short sentence, no wasted words, front-loaded with purpose. Efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With one parameter and an output schema, the description is minimal but sufficient for a simple getter. However, given the context of many sibling tools, a bit more detail on what 'configuration settings' encompasses would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (profile_id described with pattern and type). The description adds no additional meaning beyond 'configuration settings for a profile.' Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (retrieves) and resource (configuration settings for a profile). It distinguishes from sibling tools like getProfile which likely retrieves profile details. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from other getters like getPrivacySettings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling tools for getting specific settings (e.g., getPrivacySettings, getSecuritySettings), the description should indicate when getSettings is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.