replaceParentalControlServices

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description alone must disclose behavioral traits. It only states that the list is replaced, but does not mention side effects (e.g., loss of previous list), authentication needs, or rate limits. This is insufficient for safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that conveys the core action without extraneous words. It is front-loaded and concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a simple replace operation and no output schema, the description minimally covers purpose but omits details like confirmation logic or return values. It is adequate but leaves some behavioral gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes both parameters (profile_id and body array with id items). The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score applies. Schema coverage appears high despite the 50% signal.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the verb 'Replaces' and resource 'entire list of blocked services', clearly specifying the action and scope. It distinguishes from sibling tools like addToParentalControlServices (incremental addition) and removeFromParentalControlServices (incremental removal).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this tool is for full replacement but provides no explicit guidance on when to use it versus incremental tools. It lacks alternatives or when-not context, relying on the user to infer from the tool name and siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.