getAnalyticsStatusSeries

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Retrieves' without mentioning whether the operation is read-only, requires authentication, or has rate limits. A brief mention of safety or scope is missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no redundancy or fluff, achieving conciseness. However, it could be slightly more informative without compromising length, e.g., mentioning the output schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The output schema exists, so return values are covered. The description adequately describes the core functionality but does not explain how the parameters relate to the charting use case or potential edge cases. Additional context about series granularity or default values would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, providing clear definitions for all three parameters (profile_id, from, to). The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides, warranting the baseline score of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves time-series analytics data about DNS query response status codes for charting, which is specific and distinct from sibling tools like getAnalyticsDestinationsSeries. The verb 'Retrieves' and resource 'time-series analytics data about DNS query response status codes' are precise.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings, nor does it mention prerequisites or alternatives. The phrase 'for charting' implies a use case but is insufficient without explicit comparisons.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.