Skip to main content
Glama

update_identity

Update an existing identity by ID, preserving other fields. Modify name, type, scope, voice descriptors, and more by providing only the changed values.

Instructions

Updates an existing identity by ID. Only the fields you provide are changed.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoIdentity name.
typeNoIdentity type: person, company, or hybrid.
scopeNouser: personal (only visible to you); workspace: shared with all members.
neverDoNoThings to never do.
alwaysDoNoThings to always do.
audienceNoIntended audience.
backgroundNoBackground information.
identityIdYesThe ID of the identity to update.
brandColorsNoBrand colours.
roleContextNoRole and context description.
workspaceIdNoWorkspace ID. If not provided, uses your default workspace.
brandVisualsNoVisual style description.
writingSamplesNoWriting samples.
recurringTopicsNoRecurring topics.
linkedLibraryIdsNoContext library IDs to link.
valuesPrioritiesNoValues and priorities.
voiceDescriptorsNoVoice and tone descriptors (e.g. "concise, direct, warm").
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description bears full burden. It only says 'updates' and 'Only the fields you provide are changed', which is minimal. It does not disclose permissions, return values, or potential side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose. No wasted words; every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite high complexity (17 params, no output schema), the description is minimal. It doesn't clarify return value, transactional behavior, or workspace default behavior beyond schema. Incomplete for a mutation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are already described. The description adds the partial-update constraint but no additional meaning per parameter. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Updates an existing identity by ID.' which specifies verb and resource. It is distinguished from siblings like 'create_identity' or 'delete_identity'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for modifying existing identities and mentions partial update behavior, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like create or delete.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/contextium-io/contextium-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server