Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
contextium-mcp-server

contextium-mcp-server

Official
by contextium-io
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Remote

manual_project_setup

Interactively walks users through creating a Contextium workspace, asking for confirmation at each stage for collaborative setup.

Instructions

Guided, interactive project setup — walks the user through creating a Contextium workspace step by step, asking for confirmation at each stage. Use when the user is present and wants to work through the setup together.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "manual_project_setup"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
workspaceIdNoWorkspace ID (uses default if omitted)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses interactive behavior and confirmation at each stage, but lacks details on side effects (e.g., workspace creation), required permissions, or output behavior. No annotations provided.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences front-loading purpose then usage, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adquately covers interactive nature and usage context for a simple tool, but doesn't mention expected output or post-setup state.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Parameter workspaceId is fully described in schema; description adds no additional meaning beyond that, so baseline score applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool's purpose: guided, interactive project setup for creating a Contextium workspace, distinguishing it from automated alternatives like auto_project_setup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says to use when the user is present and wants interactive setup, but doesn't state when not to use (e.g., for batch or non-interactive scenarios).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools