vibemk_update_folder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description mentions no side effects, permissions, or activation requirements. With no annotations, the full burden falls on the description, which is silent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and well-structured, using a clear format: emoji, action, resource, and brief explanation. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is sufficient for a basic understanding but lacks important context such as potential implications (e.g., needing to activate changes) or relationship to other folder operations. It covers the core action but not operational nuances.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Parameter descriptions exist but are minimal: 'New display title', 'Folder path', and 'Folder attributes' provide basic meaning. The 'attributes' parameter is notably vague, and the description adds no extra clarification beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates a folder's properties using the verb 'Update' and resource 'Folder'. It is distinguishable from related folder operations like create, delete, and move.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to use create or move folder. It only describes what it does without usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.