vibemk_get_host_groups

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations on side effects or read-only behavior, the description carries the full burden. 'List/Show all' implies a read operation but does not explicitly state that it has no side effects, nor does it describe return behavior or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and mostly focused, but 'List host groups' and 'Show all host groups' are slightly redundant. Still, it contains no unnecessary fluff beyond the emoji and the duplicated idea.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a trivial parameter-less list tool, the description is minimally sufficient, stating the resource and action. However, it does not mention the return format or any limits/filtering, so an agent gets only the basic intent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, so there is no input schema to document. The description adds no parameter-specific meaning because none is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List' and resource 'host groups', and with the tool name it is unambiguous. It is easily distinguished from sibling tools like get_service_groups or create_host_group.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given for when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_service_groups or other host-related list operations. It does not mention that it is a read-only listing or when it would be preferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.