vibemk_get_host_details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must convey side effects. The verb 'Get' implies a read-only operation, but it does not explicitly state that no changes will be made. There is no mention of error behavior, rate limits, or idempotency, so the agent lacks full transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence that is not verbose and gets to the point quickly. It lacks any structured breakdown, but for such a simple tool, the conciseness is commendable. It could add more detail without becoming bloated.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is minimal and does not explain what 'comprehensive' includes, nor does it mention the expected output or any related concepts. Given the simple interface (one parameter), it is somewhat complete, but it leaves significant ambiguity relative to sibling tools that have more specific scopes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema describes host_name as 'Name of the host', which is basic but covers 100% of the parameter. However, the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as expected format, whether it's case-sensitive, or how to obtain the name. Since coverage is full, the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool retrieves comprehensive host information, but 'comprehensive' is vague and does not specify what fields or data are included. It also does not distinguish this from sibling tools like get_host_status or get_host_config, leaving scope ambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus the many sibling tools with overlapping purpose. No conditions, use cases, or alternatives are mentioned, leaving the agent to guess based solely on the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.