vibemk_delete_password

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only restates the deletion action without elaborating on consequences such as irreversibility, whether associated data is affected, or any authorization requirements. The description adds no behavioral context beyond what the name implies.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise line: '🗑️ Delete password - Remove stored password'. It is front-loaded with the action and resource, and every word earns its place. While very brief, it is not over-specified and is easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive operation with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to mention that deletion is permanent, whether any related data is removed, or what the expected response or result is. An agent invoking this tool would have no warning about consequences, making it risky to call without additional context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers the sole parameter 'ident' with the description 'Password identifier to delete', achieving 100% schema description coverage. The tool description adds no additional meaning to the parameter, so it does not compensate beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema already documents the parameter adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'password', with a clarifying phrase 'Remove stored password'. This clearly indicates the action and target. However, it does not explicitly distinguish this from sibling tools like update_password or create_password, though the name and verb are sufficient for basic differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, side effects, or scenarios where deletion is appropriate. The only implicit context is that it is for deleting passwords, but no explicit comparison to related operations (e.g., update_password) is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.