update_zone_net
Assign a new net to an existing copper zone in your PCB layout.
Instructions
Change the net assigned to a copper zone.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| zone_id | Yes | ||
| net_name | Yes |
Assign a new net to an existing copper zone in your PCB layout.
Change the net assigned to a copper zone.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| zone_id | Yes | ||
| net_name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the basic operation but does not mention side effects (e.g., zone refill), required permissions, or whether the change is reversible.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single, clear sentence with no extraneous information. Front-loaded with the essential action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given low schema coverage, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too minimal. It lacks details on behavior, parameter constraints, and usage context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate by explaining parameters. It does not; zone_id and net_name are not described beyond their names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Change), the resource (net), and the target (copper zone). It distinguishes from sibling tools like update_zone_clearance or update_zone_priority.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool or when to avoid it. No mention of prerequisites, such as zone existence or net availability, and no alternative tool recommendations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/brovk2008/Kicad-MCP-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server