lock_dimension
Change the locked status of a dimension annotation in a PCB layout by providing its ID and the desired state.
Instructions
Lock or unlock a dimension annotation.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| dim_id | Yes | ||
| locked | Yes |
Change the locked status of a dimension annotation in a PCB layout by providing its ID and the desired state.
Lock or unlock a dimension annotation.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| dim_id | Yes | ||
| locked | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the behavioral burden, but it only states 'Lock or unlock' without disclosing side effects, permissions, or what locking entails (e.g., prevents modification).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single efficient sentence, no wasted words, but could be slightly more informative without sacrificing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and minimal description, the tool lacks context on what locking does, return behavior, or prerequisites. It is insufficient for an agent to use confidently.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the purpose or format of dim_id or locked. The parameter names alone are insufficient for correct usage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Lock or unlock' and the resource 'dimension annotation', effectively distinguishing it from sibling tools like lock_footprint or lock_shape.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs. alternatives. There are many lock_* tools, but the description does not explain specific scenarios for locking a dimension annotation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/brovk2008/Kicad-MCP-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server