export_ipc2581

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must convey behavioral traits. It only says 'Export the board' without describing effects like file overwriting, required board state, or any side effects. This is insufficient for a tool that may write to disk.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence. It is front-loaded and wastes no words, though it could include more detail without sacrificing brevity. It is appropriately short for a simple action but lacks completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has one parameter and no output schema, the description should specify the output file behavior, extension, or any constraints. It does not, so it feels incomplete for ensuring correct agent invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not mention the single parameter 'output_path' or its purpose, leaving the agent to rely solely on the schema which has no description. Schema coverage is 0%, so the description adds no value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool exports the board in IPC-2581 format, which is a specific format distinct from sibling export tools such as export_gerbers, export_dxf, etc. The verb 'export' and resource 'board' are explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus other export tools. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or exclusion of alternatives, leaving the agent to infer usage based solely on the format name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.