get_footprint_bounding_box

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only states it returns a bounding box in millimeters. Does not disclose error handling, prerequisites (e.g., existing footprint), or read-only nature beyond the implicit getter behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words. Front-loaded with purpose. Appropriate length for a simple getter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite low complexity, description lacks output format (e.g., coordinate structure) and parameter clarification. Incomplete for a tool with no output schema and no parameter documentation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Parameter 'reference' has no description in schema (0% coverage). Description does not clarify what 'reference' means (e.g., footprint reference designator or ID). No value added beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool gets the bounding box of a footprint, with units specified. Verb 'Get' and resource 'footprint' are specific, and it distinguishes from sibling getters like get_footprint or get_pad.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_footprint). No exclusions or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.