export_odb
Generate ODB++ manufacturing files for the board to standardize fabrication output.
Instructions
Export the board in ODB++ manufacturing format.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| output_path | Yes |
Generate ODB++ manufacturing files for the board to standardize fabrication output.
Export the board in ODB++ manufacturing format.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| output_path | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as whether the export is read-only or has side effects; no annotations compensate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence efficiently conveys the purpose without unnecessary text, but is on the borderline of being too terse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Lacks details on what is exported (e.g., full board, selected layers) and does not address the completeness needed for an export tool with one parameter and no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The only parameter 'output_path' is mentioned in the schema but the description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's title, leaving the expected format or constraints unclear.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool exports the board in ODB++ format, directly distinguishing it from sibling export tools by naming the specific format.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance provided on when to use this tool versus other export formats (e.g., Gerber, DXF) or any prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/brovk2008/Kicad-MCP-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server