Skip to main content
Glama
berntpopp
by berntpopp

Get Disease Descendants

get_disease_descendants
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve all transitive descendants (more specific diseases) of an Orphanet disorder via the precomputed closure, with pagination for large result sets.

Instructions

Return all transitive descendants (more specific diseases) of an Orphanet disorder via the precomputed closure, with a pagination block {total, returned, limit, offset, truncated, next_offset}. When truncated, next_commands carries a forward-page step. Use get_disease_classification for only the immediate children. Signature: get_disease_descendants(term, limit=, offset=, response_mode=).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
termYesAn ORPHAcode, label, or xref CURIE for a grouping/category term (a specific disease is a leaf and has no descendants).
limitNoMax rows returned (default 200).
offsetNoRows to skip for forward paging (default 0).
response_modeNoVerbosity: minimal|compact|standard|full (default compact).compact
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint. Description adds pagination block structure (total, returned, limit, offset, truncated, next_offset) and explains next_commands behavior. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three efficient sentences: purpose + pagination, sibling guidance, and signature. No fluff, front-loaded with key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, description covers return structure (pagination block) and distinguishes from key sibling. Could mention differences between response_mode options, but overall it's comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds valuable context: term must be a grouping/category (leaf has no descendants) and lists parameter signature. Enhances understanding beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action ('return all transitive descendants') and resource ('Orphanet disorder'), and distinguishes from sibling tool 'get_disease_classification' which returns only immediate children.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use the sibling tool instead. Provides pagination details and a signature, but no broader guidance on when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/berntpopp/orphanet-link'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server