Skip to main content
Glama
berntpopp
by berntpopp

Get Disease Ancestors

get_disease_ancestors
Read-onlyIdempotent

Obtain all broader disease ancestors for an Orphanet disorder, with pagination and adjustable verbosity.

Instructions

Return all transitive ancestors (broader diseases) of an Orphanet disorder via the precomputed closure, with a pagination block {total, returned, limit, offset, truncated, next_offset}. When truncated, next_commands carries a forward-page step. Use get_disease_classification for only the immediate parents. Signature: get_disease_ancestors(term, limit=, offset=, response_mode=).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
termYesAn ORPHAcode (ORPHA:33069 or 33069), a disease label/synonym, or an external xref CURIE that resolves to a single Orphanet term.
limitNoMax rows returned (default 200).
offsetNoRows to skip for forward paging (default 0).
response_modeNoVerbosity: minimal|compact|standard|full (default compact).compact
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, non-destructive. Description adds pagination details (truncated, next_commands) and mentions closure computation, providing useful behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with core purpose, no extraneous information. Efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but description explains pagination block structure. For a read-only tool with high schema coverage, this is largely adequate, though return content details are omitted.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so description adds minimal value beyond schema. The function signature is mentioned but parameter details are already well-documented in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns 'all transitive ancestors (broader diseases)' and distinguishes from sibling tool 'get_disease_classification' which returns immediate parents.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly mentions when to use alternative 'get_disease_classification' for immediate parents, though no additional when-not conditions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/berntpopp/orphanet-link'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server