views_comments_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'Supports notification settings' but does not disclose permissions, side effects, rate limits, or response behavior. As a create operation, mutation is implied, but no additional context is given.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences, with the main action front-loaded. There is no redundant or filler content; every word serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a relatively simple create tool with three well-documented parameters, the description is adequate but not complete. It lacks information about return values (e.g., created comment ID), error conditions, or permission requirements. Given no output schema and no annotations, more context would be helpful, but the description is not misleading.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for all three parameters (view_id, notify_all, comment_text), covering 100% of the parameters. The description adds little beyond the schema, only reinforcing the 'notification settings' aspect. Baseline 3 is appropriate given the high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific action ('Create a new comment') and a specific resource ('ClickUp chat view'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like tasks_comments_create and lists_comments_create. The phrase 'chat view' is explicit and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling comment-creation tools, the description should clarify that this is for chat views specifically, but it only implies it. There are no exclusions or alternative tool names mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.