tasks_comments_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions optional assignee and notification settings but does not disclose behavioral traits such as required permissions, side effects, response format, or whether notifications are sent. It's a minimal statement of creation without deeper context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, front-loaded with the action. It contains no filler and every phrase adds value, making it highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create tool with complete schema coverage and no output schema, the description is adequate but not rich. It lacks guidance on when to use versus sibling comment tools and does not mention any behavioral side effects. It meets the minimum viable standard but leaves gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already describes all parameters. The description adds minimal extra meaning by noting optionality of assignee and notify_all, which is already implicit from the schema's required list. This matches the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action with a specific verb and resource: 'Create a new comment on a ClickUp task.' It distinguishes from sibling tools like lists_comments_create and views_comments_create by explicitly mentioning 'task.' The optional assignee and notification settings further clarify scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage situations (when you want to comment on a task) but provides no explicit guidance on when to prefer this tool over alternatives like lists_comments_create or views_comments_create. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.