Register Sign-Ingress Webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are minimal, and the description adds only that it 'fires' on an event. No details on registration behavior, overwrite policy, authentication, or side effects. The example is helpful but insufficient for full transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with one sentence, a group label, and an example. It avoids redundancy but could benefit from a bit more structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is minimal. It lacks information on response format, error scenarios, or how the webhook will be delivered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and the description provides no parameter details beyond a single example URL. No explanation of the url parameter's purpose, format constraints, or validation rules.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Fires when any tracked planet ingresses a new sign,' which precisely defines the tool's function. It includes a group label and example, distinguishing it from sibling webhook tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus other webhook-related siblings (e.g., webhooks_dasha_change). The description only states what it does, not context for selection or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.