Decode Angel Number

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true, and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds some behavioral context: cost (10 credits), group (Esoteric), and return types (pattern classification, exact match, reduced meaning). It does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (two sentences plus metadata) and front-loaded with purpose. The example is placed after metadata, which is acceptable. Every sentence adds value, though the metadata line could be considered separate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (1 parameter, no output schema), the description provides enough information for invocation: what goes in (sequence, optional context) and what comes out (pattern classification, exact match, reduced meaning). The example further clarifies usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter ‘body’ is a raw JSON object with minimal schema. The description compensates by providing an example request body: {'sequence':'1234','context':'saw on receipt during career change'}, which clarifies required fields and usage. Without the example, the schema alone would be ambiguous.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Decode' and the resource 'a numeric sequence' (angel number), with optional 'life context'. It specifies outputs: pattern classification, exact match, and reduced single-digit meaning. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like esoteric_dreams_decode and various numerology tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other decode tools or numerology tools). There is no mention of use cases, prerequisites, or when not to use it. The agent must infer from the title and description alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.