Skip to main content
Glama
astroway

astroway-mcp

Official

Ideal Partner Signs

business_ideal_partner_sign
Read-onlyIdempotent

Find your ideal business partner sign by analyzing trine elemental synergy with birth chart details.

Instructions

Trine elemental partners with natural synergy.

[Group: Business Astrology]

Example request body: {"date":"1990-05-15","time":"14:30:00","timezoneOffset":3,"latitude":50.45,"longitude":30.52}

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dateYesBirth date YYYY-MM-DD
timeYesBirth time HH:mm:ss (local)
timezoneOffsetNoUTC offset in hours (e.g. 3 for UTC+3, -5 for EST)
latitudeNoBirth latitude in decimal degrees
longitudeNoBirth longitude in decimal degrees
houseSystemNoHouse system: P=Placidus (default), K=Koch, W=Whole Sign, E=Equal
cityNoCity name (display only)
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond what is implied by the name. Annotations indicate readOnly and idempotent, but the description adds no context about what the tool actually computes or returns.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but it sacrifices essential information for brevity. It is under-specified and unhelpful, not truly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and a complex tool with 7 parameters, the description fails to provide enough context for an agent to use the tool correctly. The purpose and output remain unclear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the input schema already describes the parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, warranting a baseline score of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Trine elemental partners with natural synergy' is vague and does not clearly state what the tool does. It lacks a specific verb and resource, making it hard to distinguish from siblings like 'business_team_compatibility'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/astroway/astroway-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server