Greene — Individuation Path

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the tool's safety profile is clear. The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond 'per natal chart,' which is consistent but does not elaborate on output or side effects. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence plus a group label and placeholder), but it omits essential information for a tool with 11 parameters. The lack of structure and the unhelpful example make it under-specified rather than efficiently concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (11 parameters, no output schema, no schema descriptions), the description is grossly incomplete. It fails to explain the tool's core function, input requirements, or return values, leaving the agent with insufficient information to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the 11 parameters. The example request body is a placeholder and provides no parameter guidance. The agent receives no help on what inputs like date, time, latitude, etc., mean.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Individuation arc per natal chart,' which identifies the resource but is vague and does not differentiate from sibling tools like modern_greene_archetypal_figures or modern_greene_lunar_myth. The term 'individuation arc' is specialized and may not be clear to an AI agent without additional context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, when to prefer this over other modern_greene tools, or what input conditions warrant its use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.