Balance (kabbalistic-strict)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate safe read operation, but the description's example includes a non-existent 'name' parameter, contradicting the actual input schema. This misleads about what inputs are needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is short, but the example is misleading and the group label adds noise. Could be more accurate and direct.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description fails to explain what the Balance number represents, how it's calculated, or the significance of the 'Mathers strict' system. No output schema, so more context needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions, but the description introduces a 'name' example not in the schema, causing confusion. It does not clarify that the tool actually requires only date and optional location parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it calculates the Balance number from initials of the full name, but the required input schema parameter is only 'date', with no 'name' parameter. This mismatch makes the purpose unclear and misleading.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool over siblings like numerology_kabbalistic_balance or other system-specific balance tools. No context or alternatives provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.