Skip to main content
Glama
aliasunder

Vault Cortex Obsidian MCP Server

Insert at Anchor

vault_insert_at_anchor

Insert content as whole lines before or after a specific line identified by a short anchor substring. Case-sensitive matching; an anchor matching more than one line is an error unless first_match is set.

Instructions

Insert content as whole lines before or after a specific line identified by a short anchor substring. Case-sensitive matching; an anchor matching more than one line is an error unless first_match is set. Same anchor resolution as vault_delete_span. Properties are preserved; YAML formatting may be normalized to block style on first edit. Operates on the body only.

Example: vault_insert_at_anchor({ path: "Tracker.md", anchor: "| 2024-03-02 | Acme", position: "after", content: "| 2024-03-03 | Beta Corp | New entry |" }) — inserts a new table row after the matched row. Example: vault_insert_at_anchor({ path: "Notes/Plan.md", anchor: "## Phase 2", position: "before", content: "> [!note] Phase 1 must close before this starts.\n" }) — inserts a callout and a blank line above the Phase 2 heading.

When to use: Adding content at a precise location identified by a nearby line's text, without needing to know the heading structure. Good for inserting rows into tables, adding items into lists at a specific position, or placing content relative to a known landmark line. Prefer vault_patch_note for heading-targeted inserts (append/prepend to a section). Prefer vault_replace_span when replacing a block rather than inserting next to it.

Parameters:

  • anchor locates a full line — the insert never splits a line.

  • content is inserted verbatim — blank lines inside it are kept, and a trailing newline adds a blank line after the inserted block.

Errors:

  • "note not found" — verify path with vault_list_notes

  • "path must end in …" — add the .md extension

  • "anchor not found" — fragment not on any line; verify with vault_read_note

  • "ambiguous anchor …" — the anchor matches multiple lines; use a longer fragment or set first_match: true

  • "absolute path blocked" / "path traversal blocked" / "hidden path blocked" — use a vault-relative path with no hidden (dot-prefixed) file or folder in it

  • "concurrent write in progress" — another write to this note is in flight; re-read the note and retry

  • "content contains a control character" — content includes a non-printable control byte; remove it before writing

  • "properties block …" — the note's properties block can't be read, or a rewrite would lose it; the error says how to repair it

  • "the note would open with a properties block …" — the edit would leave --- lines at the top of a note with no properties, around text that can't be kept as properties; the error says how to avoid it

Obsidian syntax: content is Obsidian Flavored Markdown (no escaping applied). Watch for: #word = tag, [[ = wikilink, %% = comment block.

Returns: Confirmation message "Inserted lines <before|after> anchor in " — N counts the lines content supplied.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesVault-relative path to the note, including the ".md" extension (e.g. "Notes/Plan.md", "Tracker.md"). Use the exact letter case.
anchorYesShort, unique substring on the line to insert next to (case-sensitive). Pick a brief fragment — do not paste the whole line.
contentYesContent to insert (one or more lines).
positionYes"before" places the content on the lines above the anchor line; "after" places it on the lines below. The anchor line itself is never changed.
first_matchNoIf the anchor matches more than one line, use the first match instead of erroring (default: false — ambiguity is an error).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.54.9
    • changedInput schema / properties / content / description
      Previous value: -"Content to insert (one or more lines), inserted verbatim as whole lines — blank lines are kept, and a trailing newline adds a blank line after the block."New value: +"Content to insert (one or more lines)."
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv0.54.7
    • changedInput schema / properties / path / description
      Previous value: -"Vault-relative path to the note, including the \".md\" extension (e.g. \"Notes/Plan.md\", \"Tracker.md\")"New value: +"Vault-relative path to the note, including the \".md\" extension (e.g. \"Notes/Plan.md\", \"Tracker.md\"). Use the exact letter case."
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv0.50.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / first_match / default
      Added value: +false
  4. Addedv0.41.2

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only cover the safety profile (readOnly=false, destructive=false, idempotent=false), yet the description adds rich behavior: case-sensitive matching, ambiguity-is-error unless first_match, body-only operation, property preservation, YAML normalization to block style, verbatim content insertion, trailing-newline semantics, and a comprehensive error catalog including concurrency and control-character failures. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well front-loaded with the core definition, then organized into labeled sections (examples, when to use, parameters, errors, syntax, returns). The error list is long but each entry earns its place by giving an actionable repair. Slightly verbose overall, but no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 5-parameter mutation tool with no output schema, the definition covers return format ('Inserted <N> lines <before|after> anchor in <path>'), error recovery paths, and Obsidian syntax pitfalls. Nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3, but the description adds meaning beyond the schema: the anchor locates a full line and 'the insert never splits a line', content is inserted verbatim, and a trailing newline adds a blank line. The worked examples concretely illustrate anchor/content usage. first_match behavior is also clarified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('insert content as whole lines before or after a specific line identified by a short anchor substring') and immediately differentiates from siblings by naming vault_patch_note and vault_replace_span. The anchor-based insertion mechanism is fully clear without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit 'When to use' paragraph plus direct routing to alternatives: 'Prefer vault_patch_note for heading-targeted inserts' and 'Prefer vault_replace_span when replacing a block'. Conditions that select this tool vs. its siblings are stated, not inferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.