Skip to main content
Glama

Delete Span

vault_delete_span
Destructive

Remove a block of whole lines from a note by providing short anchor substrings for the first and last lines, avoiding exact text reproduction. Handles single-line and multi-line deletions.

Instructions

Delete a contiguous block of whole lines from a note's body by referencing short anchor substrings instead of reproducing the full block text. Each anchor locates a full line — the entire line is selected, not just the matching substring. Case-sensitive matching. Properties are preserved; YAML formatting may be normalized to block style on first edit. Operates on the body only.

Example: vault_delete_span({ path: "Tracker.md", start_anchor: "| 2024-03-02 | Acme" }) — deletes the one table row whose line contains that fragment. Example: vault_delete_span({ path: "Notes/Plan.md", start_anchor: "> [!warning] Stale", end_anchor: "remove after launch" }) — deletes from the start anchor line through the end anchor line.

When to use: Removing a block you have already read — a table row, callout, or run of list items — where reproducing it exactly as old_text would be error-prone. Pick a short, unique fragment of the first line for start_anchor and, for a multi-line block, the last line for end_anchor. Prefer vault_replace_in_note for small in-place edits (this tool only deletes). To replace a block, prefer vault_replace_span (one atomic step); otherwise delete it here, then vault_patch_note to add the new content.

Parameters:

  • start_anchor + end_anchor define a line range, not a text range — each anchor locates a full line, and entire lines are removed (never cuts mid-line). Omit end_anchor for a single-line delete.

  • end_anchor is searched at or after the start line, so the span can never run backward. If both match the same line, only that one line is deleted.

  • first_match applies to both anchors independently — when an anchor matches multiple lines, takes the first instead of erroring.

  • Blank-line runs left by the deletion are collapsed to a single blank line.

Errors:

  • "note not found" — verify path with vault_list_notes

  • "anchor not found" — fragment not on any line; verify with vault_read_note

  • "ambiguous start anchor …" / "ambiguous end anchor …" — the anchor matches multiple lines; use a longer fragment or set first_match: true

  • "hidden path blocked" — the path targets a hidden (dot-prefixed) file or folder like ".obsidian/"; hidden paths are not editable, matching Obsidian

  • "concurrent write in progress" — another write to this note is in flight; re-read the note and retry

Returns: Confirmation with lines removed and a truncated preview of the deleted text.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesVault-relative path to the note, including the ".md" extension (e.g. "Tracker.md", "Notes/Plan.md")
end_anchorNoShort, unique substring that identifies the LAST line of the block, searched at or after the start_anchor line. The entire line is selected. Omit to delete just the single line containing start_anchor.
first_matchNoIf an anchor matches more than one line, delete using the first match instead of erroring (default: false — ambiguity is an error).
start_anchorYesShort, unique substring that identifies the first line of the block (case-sensitive). The entire line is selected, not just the substring. Pick a brief fragment — do not paste the whole block.
Install Server

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the destructiveHint annotation, the description discloses line-level selection (never mid-line), case-sensitive matching, end_anchor search order preventing backward spans, first_match behavior, blank-line collapse, property preservation with possible YAML normalization, and specific error modes with recovery steps. This is rich behavioral context for a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but every section earns its place: primary behavior, examples, usage guidance, parameter semantics, error handling, and return value. Information is front-loaded and organized with clear labels and bullets, avoiding rambling prose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive, nuance-heavy tool, the description covers prerequisites (read the block first), anchor selection guidance, edge cases including ambiguous anchors and concurrent writes, hidden path restrictions, and return value. There is no output schema, so the explicit return description closes the last gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Though schema coverage is 100%, the description adds crucial semantics not present in the schema: anchors select whole lines, end_anchor must be at or after the start line, omitting end_anchor means single-line deletion, and first_match applies independently to each anchor. The two worked examples demonstrate valid start/end anchor choices.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Delete a contiguous block of whole lines from a note's body' via anchor substrings. It clearly differentiates this from write/replace siblings by emphasizing that it only deletes and operates on the body only.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is an explicit 'When to use' section describing the ideal case (removing an already-read block where reproducing old_text is error-prone) and naming alternatives: prefer vault_replace_in_note for small edits and vault_replace_span for block replacement, with a fallback workflow. This makes the selection decision unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aliasunder/vault-cortex'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server