Skip to main content
Glama

Move Note

vault_move_note
Destructive

Move or rename a note and automatically update every link that points to it, avoiding broken backlinks.

Instructions

Move or rename a note and rewrite every link across the vault that points to it, like Obsidian's built-in rename. Incoming links in other notes — [[wikilinks]], [[wikilink|aliases]], [[wikilink#headings]], ![[embeds]], markdown, and frontmatter links (e.g. related:) — are updated to the new path; the moved note's own relative links are fixed so they still resolve from the new folder. A link is only rewritten when leaving it unchanged would break it, so a short [[Note]] that stays unambiguous after a folder move is left alone. Without this tool a move silently breaks every backlink.

Example: vault_move_note({ old_path: "Inbox/Draft.md", new_path: "Inbox/Spec.md" }) — pure rename. Example: vault_move_note({ old_path: "Inbox/Spec.md", new_path: "Projects/Spec.md" }) — move to another folder, updating links and the note's own relative links. Example: vault_move_note({ old_path: "Inbox/Spec.md", new_path: "Projects/Spec.md", prune_empty_folders: true }) — also remove "Inbox" if the move empties it.

When to use: Renaming a note or relocating it to a different folder while keeping the link graph intact. Prefer this over vault_write_note + vault_delete_note, which would orphan every backlink. To only change a note's body or properties, use vault_patch_note or vault_update_properties. Protected paths (About Me/, Daily Notes/) cannot be moved.

Errors:

  • "destination exists: …" — a note already lives at new_path; this tool never overwrites. Pick a free path or delete the existing note first.

  • "note not found: …" — old_path does not exist; verify it with vault_list_notes.

  • "cannot move protected path …" / "cannot move into protected path …" — old_path or new_path sits under a protected folder.

  • "only moves .md notes" — both paths must end in .md.

  • "path traversal blocked" — a path escapes the vault root; use vault-relative paths.

  • Mid-move I/O failure (rare, e.g. a permission or disk error while writing) — the move aborts and the original note is deleted only after the destination and all backlinks are written, so a failure never loses data. The error message names what failed and the resulting state: if a backlink write failed, new_path exists and the original is intact (re-run the move, deleting the partial new_path first, to finish); if the final delete failed, both old_path and new_path exist (delete old_path to finish).

Obsidian syntax: Link rewrites preserve each link's existing form — embed marker (!), heading anchor (#…), and alias (|…) are kept; a markdown link keeps its .md extension and link text. Only the target path is changed.

Returns: JSON with moved_to (the new path), links_updated (count of link occurrences rewritten), updated_notes (sorted paths of the other notes that were edited; the moved note is implied by moved_to), and pruned_empty_folders (count of source folders removed — 0 unless prune_empty_folders was set).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
new_pathYesDestination vault-relative path (e.g. "Projects/Spec.md"). Must end in .md and must not already exist; parent folders are created as needed.
old_pathYesCurrent vault-relative path of the note to move (e.g. "Inbox/Draft.md"). Must end in .md.
prune_empty_foldersNoWhen true, remove the source folder(s) if the move leaves them empty, walking up to (but never including) the vault root. Default false matches Obsidian, which leaves empty folders in place. Only removes a folder with zero entries — an in-place rename or a move into a subfolder of the source leaves it non-empty and prunes nothing.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes far beyond annotations, detailing link rewriting rules, preservation of link forms, failure handling with data safety guarantees, and specific error messages. This fully discloses behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-organized with clear sections (overview, examples, when to use, errors, Obsidian syntax, returns). It is appropriately detailed without being verbose; every sentence serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity, the description covers all aspects: input semantics, behavior, error handling, side effects, and output fields. It leaves no gaps even without an output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 100% schema coverage, the description adds significant value with concrete examples, detailed explanation of prune_empty_folders, and validation rules (e.g., both paths must end in .md). This greatly aids proper invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: moving or renaming a note while rewriting all links throughout the vault. It distinguishes itself from siblings by contrasting with vault_write_note + vault_delete_note and specifying scenarios for other tools like vault_patch_note.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit guidance on when to use this tool (renaming/relocating while preserving link integrity) and when not to (use vault_patch_note for body/property changes). Also mentions protected paths and provides error conditions, leaving no ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aliasunder/vault-cortex'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server