Skip to main content
Glama

Move Note

vault_move_note
Destructive

Move or rename a note and automatically update every link pointing to it across the vault—wikilinks, embeds, markdown, and frontmatter—so backlinks never break.

Instructions

Move or rename a note and rewrite every link across the vault that points to it, like Obsidian's built-in rename. Incoming links in other notes — [[wikilinks]], [[wikilink|aliases]], [[wikilink#headings]], ![[embeds]], markdown, and frontmatter links (e.g. related:) — are updated to the new path; the moved note's own relative links are fixed so they still resolve from the new folder, including relative links to attachments (e.g. ![[../assets/photo.png]], img). A link is only rewritten when leaving it unchanged would break it, so a short [[Note]] that stays unambiguous after a folder move is left alone. Without this tool a move silently breaks every backlink.

Example: vault_move_note({ old_path: "Inbox/Draft.md", new_path: "Inbox/Spec.md" }) — pure rename. Example: vault_move_note({ old_path: "Inbox/Spec.md", new_path: "Projects/Spec.md" }) — move to another folder, updating links and the note's own relative links. Example: vault_move_note({ old_path: "Inbox/Spec.md", new_path: "Projects/Spec.md", prune_empty_folders: true }) — also remove "Inbox" if the move empties it.

When to use: Renaming a note or relocating it to a different folder while keeping the link graph intact. Prefer this over vault_write_note + vault_delete_note, which would orphan every backlink. To only change a note's body or properties, use vault_patch_note or vault_update_properties. Protected paths (About Me/ and the daily notes folder (read from DAILY_NOTES_FOLDER or .obsidian/daily-notes.json, defaulting to Daily Notes/)) cannot be moved.

Errors:

  • "destination exists: …" — a note already lives at new_path; this tool never overwrites. Pick a free path or delete the existing note first.

  • "note not found: …" — old_path does not exist; verify it with vault_list_notes.

  • "cannot move protected path …" / "cannot move into protected path …" — old_path or new_path sits under a protected folder.

  • "path must end in …" — old_path or new_path is missing the .md extension; both paths must end in .md.

  • "path traversal blocked" — a path escapes the vault root; use vault-relative paths.

  • "hidden path blocked" — old_path or new_path targets a hidden (dot-prefixed) file or folder like ".obsidian/"; notes cannot be moved from or into hidden paths, matching Obsidian.

  • "concurrent write in progress" — a write is in flight on the note, the destination, or one of its backlink sources (the move locks all of them as one unit); retry the move.

  • "backlink set did not stabilize" — the vault was modified during the move and new backlink sources kept appearing across retries; nothing was written; retry the move.

  • Mid-move I/O failure (rare, e.g. a permission or disk error while writing) — the move aborts and the original note is deleted only after the destination and all backlinks are written, so a failure never loses data. The error message names what failed and the resulting state: if a backlink write failed, new_path exists and the original is intact (re-run the move, deleting the partial new_path first, to finish); if the final delete failed, both old_path and new_path exist (delete old_path to finish).

Obsidian syntax: Link rewrites preserve each link's existing form — embed marker (!), heading anchor (#…), and alias (|…) are kept; a markdown link keeps its original extension and link text. Only the target path is changed.

Returns: JSON with moved_to (the new path), links_updated (count of link occurrences rewritten), updated_notes (sorted paths of the other notes that were edited; the moved note is implied by moved_to), and pruned_empty_folders (count of source folders removed — 0 unless prune_empty_folders was set).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
new_pathYesDestination vault-relative path (e.g. "Projects/Spec.md"). Must end in .md and must not already exist; parent folders are created as needed.
old_pathYesCurrent vault-relative path of the note to move (e.g. "Inbox/Draft.md"). Must end in .md.
prune_empty_foldersNoWhen true, remove the source folder(s) if the move leaves them empty, walking up to (but never including) the vault root. Default false matches Obsidian, which leaves empty folders in place. Only removes a folder with zero entries — an in-place rename or a move into a subfolder of the source leaves it non-empty and prunes nothing.
Install Server

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Even though destructiveHint=true already signals mutation, the description goes far beyond it: it explains link-rewriting semantics, the no-overwrite guarantee, protected paths, hidden path blocking, concurrency locking, and detailed failure recovery behavior (e.g., 'a failure never loses data'). It even discloses partial-failure states and how to recover, which is exactly the kind of beyond-annotation context an agent needs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but tightly organized into purposeful sections: intro, examples, when-to-use, errors, syntax notes, and return value. Every section earns its place, especially for a destructive operation with link rewriting and failure cases. The core purpose is front-loaded, with supporting detail following a logical order.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of the operation—link graph rewriting, protected paths, failure recovery, and pruning—the description is complete. There is no output schema, but the description documents the return shape (moved_to, links_updated, updated_notes, pruned_empty_folders). It also catalogues the full error surface, so an agent can anticipate and respond to failures.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description genuinely adds value: it supplies concrete examples for pure rename, folder move, and prune behavior, and clarifies the prune_empty_folders semantics (walking up but never including vault root, only removing zero-entry folders). This exceeds the schema's own parameter descriptions without repeating them verbatim.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Move or rename a note and rewrite every link across the vault that points to it,' which immediately establishes both the action and its scope. It also references Obsidian's built-in rename, giving the agent an unambiguous mental model. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling read/write/delete tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The 'When to use' section explicitly states the intended scenario and names the alternative: 'Prefer this over vault_write_note + vault_delete_note, which would orphan every backlink.' It also tells the agent when to choose other tools ('To only change a note's body or properties, use vault_patch_note or vault_update_properties'). This is explicit routing guidance with no reliance on inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aliasunder/vault-cortex'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server