Skip to main content
Glama

Move Note

vault_move_note
Destructive

Move or rename a note in an Obsidian vault and rewrite all wikilinks, markdown links, embeds, and frontmatter references to keep backlinks intact.

Instructions

Move or rename a note and rewrite every link across the vault that points to it, like Obsidian's built-in rename. Incoming links in other notes — [[wikilinks]], [[wikilink|aliases]], [[wikilink#headings]], ![[embeds]], markdown, and frontmatter links (e.g. related:) — are updated to the new path; the moved note's own relative links are fixed so they still resolve from the new folder, including relative links to attachments (e.g. ![[../assets/photo.png]], img). A link is only rewritten when leaving it unchanged would break it, so a short [[Note]] that stays unambiguous after a folder move is left alone. Without this tool a move silently breaks every backlink.

Example: vault_move_note({ old_path: "Inbox/Draft.md", new_path: "Inbox/Spec.md" }) — pure rename. Example: vault_move_note({ old_path: "Inbox/Spec.md", new_path: "Projects/Spec.md" }) — move to another folder, updating links and the note's own relative links. Example: vault_move_note({ old_path: "Inbox/Spec.md", new_path: "Projects/Spec.md", prune_empty_folders: true }) — also remove "Inbox" if the move empties it.

When to use: Renaming a note or relocating it to a different folder while keeping the link graph intact. Prefer this over vault_write_note + vault_delete_note, which would orphan every backlink. To only change a note's body or properties, use vault_patch_note or vault_update_properties. Protected paths (About Me/, Daily Notes/) cannot be moved.

Errors:

  • "destination exists: …" — a note already lives at new_path; this tool never overwrites. Pick a free path or delete the existing note first.

  • "note not found: …" — old_path does not exist; verify it with vault_list_notes.

  • "cannot move protected path …" / "cannot move into protected path …" — old_path or new_path sits under a protected folder.

  • "path must end in …" — old_path or new_path is missing the .md extension; both paths must end in .md.

  • "path traversal blocked" — a path escapes the vault root; use vault-relative paths.

  • "concurrent write in progress" — a write is in flight on the note, the destination, or one of its backlink sources (the move locks all of them as one unit); retry the move.

  • Mid-move I/O failure (rare, e.g. a permission or disk error while writing) — the move aborts and the original note is deleted only after the destination and all backlinks are written, so a failure never loses data. The error message names what failed and the resulting state: if a backlink write failed, new_path exists and the original is intact (re-run the move, deleting the partial new_path first, to finish); if the final delete failed, both old_path and new_path exist (delete old_path to finish).

Obsidian syntax: Link rewrites preserve each link's existing form — embed marker (!), heading anchor (#…), and alias (|…) are kept; a markdown link keeps its original extension and link text. Only the target path is changed.

Returns: JSON with moved_to (the new path), links_updated (count of link occurrences rewritten), updated_notes (sorted paths of the other notes that were edited; the moved note is implied by moved_to), and pruned_empty_folders (count of source folders removed — 0 unless prune_empty_folders was set).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
new_pathYesDestination vault-relative path (e.g. "Projects/Spec.md"). Must end in .md and must not already exist; parent folders are created as needed.
old_pathYesCurrent vault-relative path of the note to move (e.g. "Inbox/Draft.md"). Must end in .md.
prune_empty_foldersNoWhen true, remove the source folder(s) if the move leaves them empty, walking up to (but never including) the vault root. Default false matches Obsidian, which leaves empty folders in place. Only removes a folder with zero entries — an in-place rename or a move into a subfolder of the source leaves it non-empty and prunes nothing.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description details behavioral traits beyond annotations: link rewriting, relative link fixing, no overwrite, error conditions (e.g., 'destination exists', 'note not found'), concurrency handling, and mid-move I/O failure recovery. Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true, but description adds critical context about what is destroyed (original note only after successful write). No contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is comprehensive but somewhat lengthy. It is front-loaded with the core purpose, followed by examples and error details. Every sentence adds value, but could be more concise for quick agent scanning. However, given the complexity, the length is justified.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 3 parameters, no output schema provided, and is complex (move, rename, link rewriting). The description thoroughly covers return value: JSON with moved_to, links_updated, updated_notes, pruned_empty_folders. Also covers error handling comprehensively. No gaps in information needed for agent invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so schema already describes parameters well. Description adds value with examples for each parameter, explains prune_empty_folders behavior in depth, and reiterates constraints (e.g., paths must end in .md). However, the schema itself is already fairly descriptive, slightly reducing the need for additional explanation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Move or rename a note and rewrite every link across the vault that points to it', specifying the verb (move/rename) and resource (note). It distinguishes from siblings like vault_write_note + vault_delete_note, vault_patch_note, and vault_update_properties.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use: 'Renaming a note or relocating it to a different folder while keeping the link graph intact.' Provides alternatives: 'Prefer this over vault_write_note + vault_delete_note', and 'To only change a note's body or properties, use vault_patch_note or vault_update_properties.' Also mentions protected paths cannot be moved.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aliasunder/vault-cortex'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server