Renforge Saves

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It does hint at a behavioral trait (no screenshot payloads are included) but omits whether save operations overwrite existing slots, what happens if a slot is missing on load, or auth/permission needs. For a mutation-capable tool this is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence, front-loaded with the verb list and ending on the key scope caveat. It is appropriately sized for the amount of information given.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters at 0% schema coverage, no annotations, and no output schema details available to the description text, the definition is far too thin. The action parameter accepts arbitrary strings with no enum constraints, and the description makes no attempt to enumerate valid actions or parameter expectations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It only mentions 'named save slots', which does not explain the five parameters (slot, action, regexp, extra_info, project_path) or their accepted formats, despite the schema providing no descriptions at all.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states specific verbs (save, load, list) and a resource (named save slots), including a distinguishing scope note (without screenshot payloads). It is clearly distinguishable from siblings like renforge_screenshot or renforge_capture_screenshot. However, it does not name a specific alternative tool, so it stops short of the sibling-differentiating 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The three supported actions are implied, but there is no explicit guidance on which action to pick, when to use this over renforge_game_state or renforge_new_game, or any prerequisites for slot naming. Usage is only weakly implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.