economy_create_shop
Create a shop by defining items and their costs with currency IDs and amounts.
Instructions
Create shop with items and costs
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| items | Yes | ||
| shopId | Yes |
Create a shop by defining items and their costs with currency IDs and amounts.
Create shop with items and costs
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| items | Yes | ||
| shopId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'create shop' without mentioning overwrite behavior, prerequisites, or consequences of missing references.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise at 5 words and front-loaded. However, it could include more structure without losing brevity, such as listing required parameters.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given three required parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain return values, error conditions, or behavior for existing shop IDs.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It mentions 'items and costs', adding some context beyond the schema, but lacks specifics on the nested structure of items and costs (e.g., required fields within arrays).
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'create' and the resource 'shop' with sub-elements 'items and costs'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'economy_create_currency' and 'economy_create_item'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as updating a shop or creating other economy entities. The usage is only implicitly understood from the action verb.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aka-kika/unity-super-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server