economy_create_currency

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Create currency' without mentioning mutability, permissions, side effects, limits, or idempotency. Essential behavioral context is missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise and front-loaded with the key action. However, it sacrifices necessary detail; every sentence should earn its place, and while this one does convey the core purpose, it omits critical information, making it moderately effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters, no output schema, no annotations, and multiple siblings, the description is severely inadequate. It explains nothing about return values, parameter roles, or behavioral details, leaving the agent with insufficient guidance to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 4 parameters with 0% description coverage. The tool description adds no information about parameter meanings, types, or constraints, leaving the agent to infer everything from the schema alone. This fails to compensate for the low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Create) and the resource (currency), and it specifies the context (Economy 2.0). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like economy_create_item and economy_create_shop, which create different entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for creating a currency, but it provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. The context is inferred from the tool name and siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.