trace_state

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the tool shows the MCDS state window with settings, buffer status, and configuration, and returns state information. However, it does not state whether the operation is read-only, requires a specific trace state, or has any side effects. Without annotations, more behavioral context would be helpful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and every sentence adds value. It is efficient and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with an output schema, the description is reasonably complete. It identifies the resource and what is shown. However, given the presence of many sibling trace tools, a brief note on typical use cases would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. Per guidelines, zero parameters baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter information because none exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves current MCDS trace state and configuration, specifying a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('MCDS trace state and configuration'). It distinguishes itself from other trace tools by focusing on state/configuration rather than data operations or clearing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the many sibling trace tools (e.g., trace_list, trace_start). The description lacks context for choosing this over alternatives, which is a significant gap given the extensive sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.