set_peripheral_suspend

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It explains that peripheral modules are suspended when CPU halts, and the effect of enabling/disabling. However, it does not mention persistence, permissions, or side effects, leaving some gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured: a one-line summary, followed by a detailed explanation, then parameter and return documentation. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with a single boolean parameter and an output schema already defined, the description provides sufficient context: purpose, behavior, parameter meaning, and confirmation of return. Nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description includes an 'Args' section that explains the 'enabled' parameter: 'True to enable peripheral suspend, False to disable'. This adds meaningful semantic clarity beyond the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Enable or disable automatic peripheral suspend when CPU halts', specifying the exact action and resource. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'suspend_peripheral', which may have a similar purpose, so it loses one point.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use the tool: to prevent watchdog timeouts and timer overflows during debugging. It provides clear context. However, it does not mention when not to use it or compare to alternatives like 'suspend_peripheral'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.