remove_paper

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the removal action and optional Zotero deletion, but does not elaborate on destructive nature, reversibility, permissions, side effects, or how dry_run works. This is minimal transparency for a destructive tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that states the core functionality without any extraneous words. It is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool complexity (3 parameters, 1 required) and presence of an output schema, the description covers the main action and one parameter but misses dry_run behavior and identifier format. It is adequate but has clear gaps for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, so the description must add meaning. While 'optionally deleting its Zotero item' hints at the include_zotero parameter, it does not explain the required identifier (e.g., paper ID format) or the dry_run parameter, leaving significant ambiguity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'remove' and the resource 'paper from the vault', with an optional Zotero deletion, making the purpose unambiguous. It implicitly distinguishes from sibling tools like add_paper, move_paper, and mark_paper, as removal is a distinct action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided; the description does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives like move_paper or mark_paper. There is no discussion of prerequisites, confirmation steps, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.