emit_cluster_base

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only says 'emit or refresh', implying possible overwrite, but does not detail side effects, such as whether existing files are replaced or what happens with the force parameter. With no annotations, the description should cover behavioral traits thoroughly.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it lacks structure and fails to organize information about usage, parameters, or behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description does not reference what the tool returns. Given the large set of sibling tools, the description is too sparse to fully inform the agent's decision-making.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description does not explain the parameters 'cluster_slug' or 'force'. The agent receives no guidance on their meaning or expected values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool emits/refreshes a .base dashboard file for a cluster. However, it does not distinguish from the sibling tool 'generate_dashboard', which could have overlapping functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'generate_dashboard'. There is no indication of preconditions or context for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.