read_crystal

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states 'Read' implying a safe, read-only operation, but does not explicitly confirm this or mention any other behavioral traits (e.g., idempotency, rate limits).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The single sentence is concise but too terse. It lacks structure such as parameter explanations or usage examples. It conveys purpose but fails to earn its place by omitting critical details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is incomplete for a tool with three parameters and an output schema. It does not explain the parameters sufficiently, especially 'level' with its default. While output schema may handle return values, the input side is underdescribed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description only vaguely references 'detail level' for the 'level' parameter. It does not explain the meaning of 'cluster_slug' or 'crystal_slug', nor does it clarify valid values or the default for 'level'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Read' and the resource 'crystal', immediately distinguishing this from siblings like 'list_crystals'. The mention of 'detail level' hints at the 'level' parameter, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention when not to use it, nor does it reference siblings like 'list_crystals' for listing all crystals.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.