Skip to main content
Glama

bulk_ioc_lookup

Read-onlyIdempotent

Batch query up to 10 (free) or 50 (pro) IOCs in one request. Auto-detects indicator type and queries abuse.ch feeds for each. Use for SOC alert triage or batch enrichment.

Instructions

Batch query multiple IOCs (IP/domain/URL/hash, up to 10 free/50 pro) in 1 request: auto-detects type + queries abuse.ch feeds per-indicator. Per-type source coverage matches ioc_lookup: hash → ThreatFox only; IP → ThreatFox + Feodo + URLhaus; domain / URL → ThreatFox + URLhaus. Each result item carries its own verdict.sources_queried / sources_unavailable so partial failures are visible per indicator. Use for SOC alert triage or batch enrichment; use ioc_lookup for single indicator. Free: 100/hr (1 per item), Pro: 1000/hr. Returns {results, total, successful, failed, timed_out, partial, summary}.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
indicatorsYesList of indicators of compromise: IP addresses, domains, URLs, or file hashes (e.g. ['8.8.8.8', 'evil.com', 'd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e']). Maximum 10 per request for free tier, 50 for Pro. Each indicator type is auto-detected.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds valuable context beyond annotations: per-type source coverage, partial failure visibility via verdict fields, and return object structure. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences front-loaded with purpose and packed with details. Slightly lengthy but every sentence earns its place; no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With output schema present, description covers input limits, usage context, behavioral details, and return structure. Completely addresses complexity of a batch enrichment tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers parameter fully (100% coverage), so baseline is 3. Description adds auto-detection clarification and max limits, providing marginal extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states batch query of multiple IOCs with auto-detection of type and per-indicator feed queries. Explicitly distinguishes from sibling ioc_lookup for single indicator use.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use (SOC triage, batch enrichment) and when-not (use ioc_lookup for single indicator). Also details rate limits (100/hr free, 1000/hr pro) to guide selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/UPinar/contrastapi'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server