contrastapi
Related Servers
Alternatives to contrastapi
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for querying the Shodan API and Shodan CVEDB. This server provides tools for IP lookups, device searches, DNS lookups, vulnerability queries, CPE lookups, and more.72,211 npm189MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA MCP server for querying the VirusTotal API. This server provides tools for scanning URLs, analyzing file hashes, and retrieving IP address reports.111,694 npm155MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceZero-key security toolkit for your AI assistant: grade any website's security A+ to F, check if CVEs are actively exploited via CISA KEV and EPSS, and get MITRE ATT&CK defenses explained in plain English. No API keys, no signup.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceVulnerability intelligence for AI agents that enables CVE lookup, package vulnerability checks, and dependency auditing without API keys.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides CVE search enriched with EPSS exploit likelihood and CISA KEV status, plus live IP/domain reputation and a real-time threat feed for AI agents.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceDomain security reconnaissance for AI agents — 13 tools (DNS+DNSSEC, SSL/TLS, HTTP security headers, SPF/DKIM/DMARC email auth, port scan, ASN, RDAP/WHOIS) plus a one-shot security_scan returning a 0–100 Health Score (A–F). Free, no API key.33687 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceGives AI agents security-analyst lookups: CVE triage with P1–P4 prioritisation from NVD, EPSS and CISA KEV data, vulnerability checks for open-source packages via OSV.dev, and indicator extraction, defanging and refanging of free text. It runs on free public sources with no API keys required.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides multi-source vulnerability intelligence for AI-powered security operations, combining NVD CVSS, CISA KEV, and EPSS scores without requiring an API key.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 55 tools
Descriptions diligently navigate overlaps (e.g., 'use ioc_lookup for single, bulk_ioc_lookup for batch'), which helps, but several clusters are genuinely confusable: domain_report vs audit_domain vs contrast_scan, ip_lookup vs threat_report, and especially email_mx vs email_security_posture vs email_verify all cover SPF/DMARC/DKIM posture. The lookup/search/bulk families for CVE, ATLAS, D3FEND and Sigma add many near-sibling tools whose boundaries must be inferred from prose.
All names are snake_case, which keeps things readable, and families are internally consistent (X_lookup, X_search, bulk_X, d3fend_X). However, verb position is mixed: noun-first forms like ssl_check, dns_lookup, whois_lookup coexist with verb-first forms like check_headers, scan_headers, calculate_risk_score, get_cvss_details, so there is no single predictable pattern.
55 tools is well above the 25+ heavy threshold and includes substantial redundancy: explicit bulk twins for ioc, cve, atlas technique, and sigma lookups, plus three overlapping email-auth tools and multiple IP/domain recon tools that could be consolidated. The domain is broad enough that some sprawl is defensible, but the surface is larger than necessary.
Coverage is exceptionally thorough: indicators, malware/hash, domain/DNS/WHOIS/SSL/subdomains, email auth, CVE lifecycle (search, leading, detail, KEV, CVSS parsing, risk scoring, exploits, CWE), and MITRE ATT&CK/ATLAS/D3FEND/Sigma catalogs all have lookup plus search/bulk variants. Almost every entity supports both drill-down and discovery, leaving no significant dead ends.