Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to contrastapi

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for querying the Shodan API and Shodan CVEDB. This server provides tools for IP lookups, device searches, DNS lookups, vulnerability queries, CPE lookups, and more.
    7
    661 npm
    178
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A MCP server for querying the VirusTotal API. This server provides tools for scanning URLs, analyzing file hashes, and retrieving IP address reports.
    11
    1,562 npm
    151
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Zero-key security toolkit for your AI assistant: grade any website's security A+ to F, check if CVEs are actively exploited via CISA KEV and EPSS, and get MITRE ATT&CK defenses explained in plain English. No API keys, no signup.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Domain security reconnaissance for AI agents — 13 tools (DNS+DNSSEC, SSL/TLS, HTTP security headers, SPF/DKIM/DMARC email auth, port scan, ASN, RDAP/WHOIS) plus a one-shot security_scan returning a 0–100 Health Score (A–F). Free, no API key.
    30
    1,404 npm
    1
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides real-time threat intelligence for AI agents, enabling checks on IPs, domains, URLs, hashes, CVEs, prompt-injection payloads, and malicious AI-skill/MCP-tool definitions against a free database of 890K+ IOCs.
    -

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 55 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Descriptions diligently navigate overlaps (e.g., 'use ioc_lookup for single, bulk_ioc_lookup for batch'), which helps, but several clusters are genuinely confusable: domain_report vs audit_domain vs contrast_scan, ip_lookup vs threat_report, and especially email_mx vs email_security_posture vs email_verify all cover SPF/DMARC/DKIM posture. The lookup/search/bulk families for CVE, ATLAS, D3FEND and Sigma add many near-sibling tools whose boundaries must be inferred from prose.

Naming Consistency3/5

All names are snake_case, which keeps things readable, and families are internally consistent (X_lookup, X_search, bulk_X, d3fend_X). However, verb position is mixed: noun-first forms like ssl_check, dns_lookup, whois_lookup coexist with verb-first forms like check_headers, scan_headers, calculate_risk_score, get_cvss_details, so there is no single predictable pattern.

Tool Count2/5

55 tools is well above the 25+ heavy threshold and includes substantial redundancy: explicit bulk twins for ioc, cve, atlas technique, and sigma lookups, plus three overlapping email-auth tools and multiple IP/domain recon tools that could be consolidated. The domain is broad enough that some sprawl is defensible, but the surface is larger than necessary.

Completeness5/5

Coverage is exceptionally thorough: indicators, malware/hash, domain/DNS/WHOIS/SSL/subdomains, email auth, CVE lifecycle (search, leading, detail, KEV, CVSS parsing, risk scoring, exploits, CWE), and MITRE ATT&CK/ATLAS/D3FEND/Sigma catalogs all have lookup plus search/bulk variants. Almost every entity supports both drill-down and discovery, leaving no significant dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week