vulnerability_links_search_by_fields

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as permissions, rate limits, return value, or side effects. The description contradicts the schema by claiming required parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, but it includes redundant information like the full endpoint path. It could be more concise by omitting the HTTP method and endpoint.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 9 parameters and no output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It provides no information about response format, pagination, error handling, or the meaning of 'connection'. The tool's complexity demands a much richer description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% but the descriptions are minimal (e.g., 'query param from (int)'). The description adds no additional meaning and incorrectly states that 'from, size, q' are required, contradicting the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the HTTP endpoint and says 'Get object by connection', which gives a vague idea of searching for vulnerability links. It distinguishes from sibling tools by naming the endpoint, but the purpose is unclear due to the phrase 'by connection' without explanation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It incorrectly states that 'from, size, q' are required, while the schema marks them as optional, which could mislead an agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.