task_endpoints_event_count_1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description fails to disclose important behavioral traits: it does not state that it's a POST (only implied), whether it requires authentication, what the response looks like, or any rate limits. The list of allowed values is useful but not comprehensive for behavioral understanding.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is a single run-on sentence with a massive inline list of enum values, making it hard to parse. Not structured for quick comprehension.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and complex context (3 params, many siblings), the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, how to count, or differentiate from similar tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions are minimal ('query param q (str)'). Description adds allowed values for 'analyticsEventAction' but does not explain 'q' or 'body'. The body parameter has no guidance, and it's unclear when to use it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Count objects' but is vague; doesn't specify the resource (task endpoints events) or differentiate from sibling 'task_endpoints_event_count'. The list of allowed values for analyticsEventAction provides context but does not clarify the tool's core purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'task_endpoints_event_count' or 'task_endpoints_event_filter'. No mention of prerequisites or scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.