automation_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist. The description only mentions 'Update' and 'Requires a JSON request body', but does not disclose idempotency, error responses, permissions, or side effects. This leaves the agent uninformed about behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, but includes unnecessary technical details like the HTTP method and endpoint path. It is not well-structured for an AI agent, lacking front-loaded clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, no annotations, and a sparse description. The tool concept (update) is broad, and the description fails to cover what specific fields can be updated, constraints, or potential impact on the system.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the 'body' parameter described as 'JSON request body'. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, merely restating that a JSON body is required. No benefit over structured data.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Update instance of the object' which identifies a verb and resource, but fails to specify which object type (e.g., automation). Among siblings like 'automations_update_state' and 'automation_delete', the lack of specificity reduces clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'automations_update_state' or 'task_template_update'. No prerequisites or context for invocation are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.