operating_system_family_search_by_fields

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description claims 'Required: from, size, q' but the schema shows all parameters are optional, creating a contradiction. No disclosure of search behavior, pagination, or side effects is provided.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but it lacks substance and clarity. It is under-specification rather than efficient conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 9 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description fails to provide sufficient context for an agent to understand the tool's purpose, behavior, or correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although the schema has 100% coverage, the description misinforms by labeling parameters as required when they are not, and adds no additional semantic value beyond the schema's parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get object by connection' is vague and does not clarify what an operating system family is or what 'by connection' means. It mentions the endpoint and required params, but does not distinguish it from other search tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives like other search_by_fields tools. The description lacks context on preferred use cases or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.