organization_endpoint_patch_patch_packages_count_1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description does not disclose behavioral traits such as idempotency, side effects, or rate limits. It only states it counts, but does not describe response format or safety.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single run-on sentence with a long inline list of values, making it hard to parse. It is not front-loaded effectively and lacks structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without an output schema, the description should explain what the count returns, but it does not. The input parameters are partially described, and the vague 'by stuff' does not convey the full context needed for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%. The description adds a list of allowed values for analyticsEventAction beyond the schema, but contradicts itself by claiming 'Required: q' while the schema shows q as optional. It does not explain the 'body' parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it counts objects for organization endpoint patch patch packages, but is vague with 'Count objects by stuff'. It does not clearly differentiate from sibling tools like organization_endpoint_patch_patch_packages_count or filter endpoints.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The sibling list includes many similar tools, but no comparison or context is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.